At first, Behe defines Darwinian evolution as “a process by which life arose from inert matter and later developed completely by natural means.” But he tempers the viability of evolution with questions arising from the “irreducible complexity” in biochemical processes. Answering unanswered questions that arise in the theory of evolution, Behe argues: “At the tiniest levels of biology, the chemical life of the cell, we have discovered a complex world that radically changes the grounds on which Darwinian debates must be fought.. “
Behe admits Catholic heritage in a biochemical environment; as such, from the beginning he writes with one hand tied behind his back. Behe’s biological metaphysician is the creationist in Darwin’s critique of evolution. Like all traditional religious, he tempers conservative spirituality with generous helpings of liberal doctrinaire.
Science conceived the idea of cellular existence around the same time as Darwin’s evolutionary journey and vision. He was unable to access Behe’s considerable library on cell structure, advanced molecular knowledge, not even contemporary theorists Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann, who concluded: “cells make up the entire bodies of animals and plants, and that in some way cells are individual units with a life of their own. “Behe described Schleiden and Schwann as biochemists at work in the early and mid-19th century, the time of Darwin’s travels and writing notes to write” The Origin of Species. “In this sense, the new discoveries in the field of biology were not available to the intrepid Darwin.
Behe assigns Darwin’s theory to a “black box” of unanswered questions. It denigrates Darwin’s broad-based theory and creates some ‘black boxes’ of its own: namely, the perception of ‘irreducible complexity’ in cell development, even when such complexity can be further reduced, to the smallest atomic particle and atom. affinity for symbiosis. He postulates that the last remaining box is the cell, opened to reveal molecules, the basis of nature. But the foundation of nature does not rest, not in molecules, but in individual atoms and these are somehow affected by subatomic particles and other forces not yet classified or not proven as energetic incentives. Basic biochemistry must perceive the assembly of two or more atoms to constitute the molecular creation. Hydrogen atoms are the most abundant element in the universe and are used in the production of synthetic ammonia and methanol, in the refining of petroleum, and in the hydrogenation of organic materials. Within the qualities of hydrogen and oxygen lies the propensity to create water; all it takes are two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom to create a water molecule; even so, a catalyst is necessary to instigate the precipitation; however, all other molecules result from different combinations of atoms.
Behe admits that black boxes sometimes happen inside black boxes, and sometimes new boxes demand that we revise all of our theories. Therefore, Darwin cannot be the only theorist who creates Black Boxes without qualification or resolution. Behe quotes Stuart Kauffman of the Santa Fe Institute, who suggested that the Darwinian theory of evolution is true and explains the molecular structure of life. Of course, Darwin could not explain the molecular structure because the biochemical knowledge and tools available today were not widely available in Darwin’s time.
A flaw is found in Behe’s consensus to denigrate “natural selection” as unworthy of explaining the “irreducible complexity” common to cell development. Contrary to Behe’s view, the “irreducible complexity” found in cell development does not preclude the possibility of “natural selection” processes. He sneaks a mosquito and swallows a camel!
Hydrogen and oxygen have the inherent propensity to produce water, without the influence of creatures. Could we not conclude that the same combined force exists in another atomic essence? Gold ore does not appear as an initial occurrence, but gold atoms have the propensity to assimilate under the right conditions, into metal grains, nuggets, and threads. The B cell antibody mimics atomic attraction, its ‘Y’ extension of the cell body construction, in its divided extension, is configured to conform to the shape of found objects (bacteria) and therefore is binds, the B cell then replicates its antibody properties. . And doesn’t the human brain look like the evolution of a polypeptide folded into a quaternary structure? We find a lot of similarity in visible assemblages and microbiology. Doesn’t a polypeptide support the same fold around your spine as a developing fetus?
Behe demonstrates that the cell is a molecular machine and describes the molecular steps in the production of AMP, a mononucleotide found in cells. First, a composite molecule begins the construction processes with the assembly of carbon, oxygen, and phosphorus, as the host molecule. So we started an incredibly complex system of adding atom substrates and later discarding atom components that are no longer needed. Evolution, from one stage to another, motivates the attraction of other compounds of atoms; with each additional compound inheriting the ability to reject unnecessary atoms and thus prepare for the next fusion. A dozen sequenced diagrams illustrate Behe’s “irreducible complexity.” Wow! Irreducible? Isn’t AMP a product of evolution?
Contrary to Behe’s bias, AMP production, similar to other molecular designs, cannot be separated from Darwin’s hypotheses on a larger scale; Because the development of molecules is also derived from inanimate matter and subsequently develops completely by natural means!
Creationism appeals to the majority intellect; and often, Evolution paints its own evil contrast to the purity of Creation. But that represents a mere appeasement of metaphysical convictions and, therefore, a delight enjoyed by the consensus of the majority. After all, Michael J. Behe was a Catholic first, a biologist second, and an apologist third. It makes little sense for Behe to criticize Darwin’s theory of evolution, in light of his own AMP molecular development that lives alongside Darwin’s evolutionary processes.
In the interest of science, Behe devised understandable biochemical processes that involve “irreducible complexity” and that contribute much to the enlightenment of the reader. We recommend this book as a means for modest intellects to understand how living creatures are derived from quantum incentives. Evolution, or intelligent design, remains unresolved and is left to individual determination. However, there is research that questions the distinction between “irreducible complexity” and evolution. Intelligence, as in AMP segments, must seek its own destiny.