For starters, new technical authors need to carefully format their technical articles and then learn the details of the target journals in which they want to publish them. These two processes alone take time and energy because each section of an article has its own requirements. For example, the experimental section requires explicit details so that others can duplicate the work. Additionally, the summary and discussion sections could appeal to executives and regular scientists alike.
Additionally, if the proposed articles are to be peer-reviewed, the authors could face competitive reviewers. These situations can lead to more stress and seemingly unnecessary revisions. Authors may also have to incorporate new ideas into their articles along with substantial rebuttals to the editors. However, in the end, the final decisions belong to the editors, not the reviewers.
Formatting
Generally, the format of a proposed article is quickly learned and there are only slight differences between the target journals in question. A basic format is as follows: abstract or abstract, introduction / background, experimental / methods, results, discussion / conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgments, and references.
Accuracy
Scientific precision is the most important component of the proposed article, rather than the writing itself. Too often, authors may come across numerous apparently valid reasons for filling in article results for commercial purposes. But they are not true. Such reasons are never valid enough to fill in or falsify scientific data.
People
People will be people, even professionals. Sometimes we can get petty, especially when we try to guarantee what we perceive as our future and security. That could mean putting handles on those who could disrupt our sense of security, including those who publish scientific papers. This type of human behavior goes with the technical-publishing territory to a certain extent. However, if it is treated simply, it does not need to get out of hand.
Control
The scientific authors themselves must be well founded in the knowledge they present, as well as in their own abilities. Sometimes your own local reviewers and managers will exercise unnecessary opinions on the proposed paper for their own reasons of aggrandizement and control.
The only way these reviewers can gain that kind of control is to inject something into the article or the author’s mind that isn’t true, especially if they are trying to control both the author and the post too much. This fraudulent step separates the author from the exact truth, making him more susceptible to abusive man-made controls. These types of situations occur where basic professionalism is lacking.
Editors
Scientific journal editors have seen it all. They are smart, capable, and insightful. They can instantly recognize the game interfering with the proposed articles that are sent to them.
Fortunately, because these editors want their magazines to be top-notch, they are leaning toward intense precision. They want their articles to contain accurate science and credits, and to be written by the voices of accurate writers.
Therefore, new technical authors may want to take a technical writing course before submitting an article for publication. For detailed information on this type of publication, see the following website.